Spationics: Review of Assumptions

The key question is whether the manipulation of spatial dynamics is possible within those dynamics. In other words are there means within a segment of space to manipulate the spatial segment itself? The evidence of the senses denies this possibility, but radio waves don't look promising either until you have heard the music they produce. The lessons of the senses are already trained to the imprisonment of space time and should not be taken too seriously.

One operating notion is that in some manner frequency will un-lock the limits of spationics: ultrasound, harmonics, megahertz laser pulses or the like. This is an interesting conundrum because frequency is a derivative of time, depending on the core belief that the same energy pulse is modulating in succeeding nanoseconds. This works in electronics, which is safely within the perimeters of space continuity.

The question is, can a derivative of time (frequency) evaluate (impose a result on ) a derivative of space?

At a metaphysical level we have the observations that space in experience is equivalent to and derivative from Beingness, while time is essentially a derivative of consideration about persistence. It has persisted to this moment from that moment; it is the same as it was except for relative position. therefore time has passed. This chain of rationalization imposes the neat and orderly engineering continuum on the otherwise chaotic vista of creative impulses that are the generators of our wonderful force-filled universe.

If the barriers inherent in a segment of space are such that frequency-derived manipulations cannot, by some law of nature, have any effect on them, then spationics is doomed until the mathematics of black-hole reversal unleashes it. Or until the power of beingness becomes harnessed in a predictable manner not just derived from poor copies of enthusiasm and opinion.

# # #

Previous Essay / Next Essay / Table of Contents